{"id":73278,"date":"2026-11-03T20:57:16","date_gmt":"2026-11-03T20:57:16","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/diaspora.biz\/?p=73278"},"modified":"2026-11-03T20:57:16","modified_gmt":"2026-11-03T20:57:16","slug":"in-kansas-both-sides-twist-the-facts-in-accusations-of-protecting-pedophiles","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/diaspora.biz\/?p=73278","title":{"rendered":"In Kansas, Both Sides Twist the Facts in Accusations of Protecting Pedophiles"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><img width=\"640\" height=\"273\" src=\"https:\/\/cdn.factcheck.org\/UploadedFiles\/Kansas-720-x-307.png\" class=\"attachment-medium_large size-medium_large wp-post-image\" alt=\"\" style=\"float:left; margin:0 15px 15px 0;\" decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\" srcset=\"https:\/\/cdn.factcheck.org\/UploadedFiles\/Kansas-720-x-307.png 720w, https:\/\/cdn.factcheck.org\/UploadedFiles\/Kansas-720-x-307-340x145.png 340w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 640px) 100vw, 640px\" \/><\/p>\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">In Kansas\u2019 tight Senate race, ads from Democratic and Republican outside groups are accusing the other party\u2019s candidate of having protected pedophiles. In both cases, the attacks are misleading or unsupported by the evidence.<\/p>\n<div class=\"wp-block-image\">\n<figure class=\"alignleft size-full\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"243\" height=\"219\" src=\"https:\/\/cdn.factcheck.org\/UploadedFiles\/MW-BUG-2026.png\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-281925\" srcset=\"https:\/\/cdn.factcheck.org\/UploadedFiles\/MW-BUG-2026.png 243w, https:\/\/cdn.factcheck.org\/UploadedFiles\/MW-BUG-2026-161x145.png 161w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 243px) 100vw, 243px\" \/><\/figure>\n<\/div>\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Ads from Democratic groups misleadingly claim Sen. Roger Marshall, the Republican incumbent, helped cover up Jeffrey Epstein\u2019s crimes by voting to keep the Epstein files under wraps while taking money from the convicted sex offender\u2019s \u201cassociates.\u201d\u00a0<\/p>\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Marshall supported the November 2025 law that required the Justice Department to publicly release the files. He previously voted against a Democratic amendment calling for the files\u2019 release, saying he opposed attaching it to an unrelated defense bill. As for the purported Epstein \u201cassociates,\u201d they\u2019re people whose names appear incidentally in the files but had no documented contact with Epstein, or whose interactions with him were limited. None has been accused of wrongdoing.<\/p>\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">An ad from a Republican group, meanwhile, claims Democratic candidate Adam Hamilton, a pastor, \u201cprotected a pedophile\u201d accused of molesting teenage boys two decades ago at a camp his church ran. <\/p>\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">According to court records reviewed by local news outlets, the boys reported the abuse but couldn\u2019t identify the culprit, and the church didn\u2019t notify police. It\u2019s unclear what role Hamilton played in that decision. The next year, a camp volunteer was caught and reported to police. Hamilton has <a href=\"https:\/\/www.cnn.com\/2026\/10\/18\/politics\/video\/cnn-manu-raju-kansas-senate-race-democrats-republicans-adam-hamilton-senator-roger-marshall\">acknowledged<\/a> that the church could have handled the situation better, but there\u2019s no evidence he knowingly protected a predator. <\/p>\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The Cook Political Report <a href=\"https:\/\/www.cookpolitical.com\/ratings\/senate-race-ratings\">rates<\/a> the Kansas race as one of several toss-ups that could determine control of the Senate on Nov. 3.\u00a0President Donald Trump <a href=\"https:\/\/www.ksn.com\/news\/live-president-trumps-midterm-rally-in-salina\/\">campaigned<\/a> for Marshall in Kansas on Nov. 1, the president\u2019s second <a href=\"https:\/\/rollcall.com\/factbase\/trump\/transcript\/donald-trump-speech-midterm-political-rally-park-city-kansas-october-19-2026\/\">rally<\/a> in the state in two weeks.<\/p>\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading has-text-align-center\"><strong>Votes on the Epstein Files<\/strong><\/h2>\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Multiple Democratic-aligned groups have run ads accusing Marshall of voting to cover up the Epstein files.<\/p>\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u201cIt was one of the worst child abuse scandals in history,\u201d states <a href=\"https:\/\/platform.adimpact.com\/viewer\/65b8d43e-f88b-4277-b178-9bc0306d07bd\">an ad<\/a> from <a href=\"https:\/\/www.factcheck.org\/2026\/09\/__trashed-5\/\">WinSenate<\/a>, a super PAC working to elect Democrats. \u201cDozens of young girls sexually trafficked by Jeffrey Epstein. Drugged, molested, and raped. And Roger Marshall helped cover it up. Marshall voted to keep the Epstein files sealed, ignoring pleas from victims and saying releasing the information was, quote, \u2018not of much interest to me.\u2019 Roger Marshall used his office to protect pedophiles.\u201d<\/p>\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><a href=\"https:\/\/platform.adimpact.com\/viewer\/8955acfc-ba5e-47dd-9573-32f0e2c84a91\">Another WinSenate ad<\/a> makes a similar claim, interspersing images of Marshall with what appears to be a photo of an Epstein victim with her face redacted.\u00a0<\/p>\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u201cShe was a 14-year-old girl,\u201d the ad\u2019s narrator says. \u201cHe was a 65-year-old senator. She was drugged, molested, and raped. And he helped cover it up. Roger Marshall took nearly $40,000 from Jeffrey Epstein\u2019s associates. Then voted to keep the Epstein files sealed, protecting pedophiles.\u201d<\/p>\n<div style='position:relative;width:100%;padding-top:56.25%;padding-bottom:40px;'><iframe loading='lazy' style='position:absolute;top:0;right:0;left:0;bottom:0;width:100%;height:100%;' src='https:\/\/platform.adimpact.com\/viewer\/8955acfc-ba5e-47dd-9573-32f0e2c84a91' frameborder='0' scrolling='no' allowfullscreen=''><\/iframe><\/div>\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">WinSenate had spent more than $6 million on the two ads combined as of the afternoon of Nov. 2, according to the ad-tracking service AdImpact. At least two other groups backing Democrats have also <a href=\"https:\/\/platform.adimpact.com\/viewer\/00de6462-5f48-4b27-a07d-63442ecfb7b2\">aired<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/platform.adimpact.com\/viewer\/e6b6b804-b888-46ad-b3e5-ad52fe928fe1\">ads<\/a> attacking Marshall over the Epstein files.<\/p>\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">These ads don\u2019t give a full account of Marshall\u2019s votes on this issue.<\/p>\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">In September 2025, Senate Democrats proposed an <a href=\"https:\/\/www.congress.gov\/amendment\/119th-congress\/senate-amendment\/3849\">amendment<\/a> to the annual defense policy bill that would have directed the Department of Justice to make the Epstein files publicly available. The amendment was killed in a <a href=\"https:\/\/www.senate.gov\/legislative\/LIS\/roll_call_votes\/vote1191\/vote_119_1_00512.htm\">mostly party-line vote<\/a>, with all but two Republicans opposed to the amendment. Marshall was among those voting against it.<\/p>\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">According to local NBC affiliate KSNT, Marshall <a href=\"https:\/\/www.ksnt.com\/news\/top-stories\/kansas-senators-explain-votes-blocking-epstein-file-release\/\">said<\/a> at the time that he supported releasing the files but opposed tying it to an unrelated defense bill, which he called a \u201cpolitical stunt.\u201d\u00a0<\/p>\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Two months later, Marshall <a href=\"https:\/\/www.marshall.senate.gov\/newsroom\/press-releases\/senator-marshall-we-know-obamacare-is-a-miserable-failure\/\">supported<\/a> a standalone <a href=\"https:\/\/www.congress.gov\/bill\/119th-congress\/house-bill\/4405\/all-actions\">bill<\/a> compelling release of the Epstein files. The bill cleared the Senate with unanimous consent, which means the bill was not opposed by Marshall or any other senator.\u00a0<\/p>\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">That vote came after Trump <a href=\"https:\/\/www.factcheck.org\/2025\/11\/sorting-out-the-facts-on-epstein-claims\/\">threw his support<\/a> behind the bill, after resisting calls to disclose the files for months.\u00a0<\/p>\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Marshall\u2019s statement that releasing the files was \u201cnot of much interest to me\u201d came in July 2025. Asked about the issue by reporters, he responded that there were bigger priorities in his view. Here\u2019s the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.ksn.com\/video\/senator-roger-marshall-omments-on-epstein-file-controversey\/10897591\/\">full quotation<\/a>:<\/p>\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u201cIt\u2019s just not my focus,\u201d Marshall said. \u201cI mean, I want justice to be served, but we need to be focused right now on telling Americans about this reconciliation bill that we did. It\u2019s going to be the largest tax cut in American history, the largest decrease in spending, we\u2019re going to secure the border, a whole lot of other things. So it\u2019s just not of much interest to me right now.\u201d<\/p>\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Lauren French, a spokesperson for WinSenate, said in an emailed statement that Marshall\u2019s initial vote against releasing the files \u201cwas a decision to keep evidence about the sexual abuse of children locked away for months longer, while the powerful people named in it kept their secrets.\u201d<\/p>\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u201cWhen survivors of Jeffrey Epstein\u2019s abuse pleaded with Roger Marshall for justice and transparency, he turned his back on them,\u201d she said. \u201cMarshall voted to kill an effort to force the Justice Department to release the Epstein files, blaming technicalities and saying, \u2018it\u2019s just not of much interest to me.\u2019 \u201d\u00a0<\/p>\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">We reached out to Marshall\u2019s campaign and haven\u2019t heard back.<\/p>\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading has-text-align-center\"><strong>Claims About \u2018Epstein\u2019s Associates\u2019<\/strong><\/h2>\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">One of the WinSenate ads also claims that Marshall \u201ctook nearly $40,000 from Jeffrey Epstein\u2019s associates.\u201d The claim doesn\u2019t hold up.<\/p>\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The ad cites an <a href=\"https:\/\/americanjournalnews.com\/roger-marshall-has-an-epstein-files-problem\/\">article<\/a> on a partisan website called American Journal News, which is <a href=\"https:\/\/americanjournalnews.com\/about\/\">published<\/a> by Democratic operative David Brock\u2019s <a href=\"https:\/\/www.politico.com\/blogs\/on-media\/2017\/02\/incoming-ceo-of-david-brocks-progressive-media-venture-backs-out-234739\">True Blue Media<\/a> and partly funded by a Democratic-aligned group he co-founded, <a href=\"https:\/\/americanbridgepac.org\/about-us\/\">American Bridge 21st Century<\/a>. (He <a href=\"https:\/\/x.com\/davidbrockdc\/status\/1593044465001693184\">stepped away<\/a> from American Bridge in 2022.)<\/p>\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The article cites four people whose names appear in the Epstein files and who also gave to one of Marshall\u2019s campaigns. As we\u2019ve written <a href=\"https:\/\/www.factcheck.org\/2026\/08\/alaska-senate-candidates-attempt-to-link-each-other-to-epstein\/\">before<\/a>, the mere fact that someone is mentioned in the files does not indicate that the person is implicated in wrongdoing, or even had a direct relationship with the disgraced financier.\u00a0<\/p>\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">One of the people mentioned in the article is <a href=\"https:\/\/www.blackstone.com\/my-personal-history\/\">Stephen Schwarzman<\/a>, chairman and CEO of the private equity firm Blackstone. We previously <a href=\"https:\/\/www.factcheck.org\/2026\/10\/democratic-ads-misleadingly-connect-susan-collins-to-epstein\/\">wrote<\/a> about a separate WinSenate ad in Maine that referred to Schwarzman as Epstein\u2019s \u201cbusiness partner,\u201d based on the fact that both men were among the initial investors in an exclusive New York City club.\u00a0<\/p>\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">As we noted at the time, they were among about 150 founding members paying $100,000 each. Aside from paying money to join the same club, it\u2019s not clear the two men ever did business together or had a close working relationship.\u00a0<\/p>\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The Epstein files include emails from a publicist inviting Epstein to two events Schwarzman was involved in: a 2015 <a href=\"https:\/\/www.justice.gov\/epstein\/files\/DataSet%209\/EFTA00355074.pdf\">event celebrating<\/a> the movie \u201cThe Imitation Game\u201d co-hosted by Schwarzman and his wife (along with former Mayor Michael Bloomberg and others) at the Schwarzman\u2019s New York home; and a 2013 anniversary celebration for the New York Observer, which <a href=\"https:\/\/www.justice.gov\/epstein\/files\/DataSet%2010\/EFTA01901849.pdf\">lists<\/a> Schwarzman as one of more than two dozen co-hosts. Epstein was <a href=\"https:\/\/www.justice.gov\/epstein\/files\/DataSet%209\/EFTA00354764.pdf\">out of town<\/a> for the 2015 event, and it\u2019s unclear if he attended the other. None of the emails shows Schwarzman and Epstein corresponding directly.<\/p>\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">A spokesperson for Schwarzman <a href=\"https:\/\/www.factcheck.org\/2026\/10\/democratic-ads-misleadingly-connect-susan-collins-to-epstein\/\">previously told us<\/a> the two men had no relationship.\u00a0<\/p>\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u201cIt would be categorically false and reckless to claim or imply that Steve had any relationship with this despicable individual,\u201d the spokesperson said in an email.<\/p>\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The article also mentions Joseph Baratta, an executive at Blackstone, who <a href=\"https:\/\/www.fec.gov\/data\/receipts\/individual-contributions\/?committee_id=C00576173&#038;contributor_name=Joseph+Baratta&#038;two_year_transaction_period=2026\">donated<\/a> $6,000 to Marshall\u2019s campaign in 2025. There\u2019s no evidence he was an \u201cassociate\u201d of Epstein.\u00a0<\/p>\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">We could find only one mention of Baratta in the files: a 2011 <a href=\"https:\/\/www.justice.gov\/epstein\/files\/DataSet%2010\/EFTA01996357.pdf\">email exchange<\/a> between Baratta and Peter Mandelson, the British politician who later lost his post as ambassador to the U.S. over his relationship with Epstein. Mandelson was in private practice as a lobbyist at the time, and the exchange seems to involve him advising Baratta on a Blackstone public relations matter. Mandelson forwarded the exchange to Epstein with the note \u201cfyi He\u2019s nice, bright guy.\u201d\u00a0<\/p>\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Nothing in the emails indicates Baratta and Epstein communicated directly.<\/p>\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u201cJoe never met, spoke with, or interacted with him in any way \u2013 period,\u201d a spokesperson for Baratta told us. \u201cJoe had absolutely no relationship with him, and it would be outrageous and patently false to suggest otherwise.\u201d<\/p>\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">A third supposed Epstein \u201cassociate\u201d mentioned in the article is Joel Magerman, head of the investment bank Bryant Park Capital, who <a href=\"https:\/\/www.fec.gov\/data\/receipts\/individual-contributions\/?committee_id=C00576173&#038;contributor_name=joel+magerman\">gave<\/a> $11,400 to Marshall\u2019s campaign in 2019. Again, we could find no evidence that Magerman and Epstein were associated. Magerman\u2019s only mentions in the Epstein files are <a href=\"https:\/\/www.justice.gov\/epstein\/files\/DataSet%209\/EFTA00763267.pdf\">two<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/www.justice.gov\/epstein\/files\/DataSet%2011\/EFTA02443577.pdf\">emails<\/a> that a broker named Barry Zelin sent to multiple recipients, including Magerman and Epstein. There\u2019s no record in the files of Magerman responding, and nothing to indicate he interacted with Epstein directly.<\/p>\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">We reached out to Magerman through his company and haven\u2019t heard back.<\/p>\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The fourth person cited in the article is a Paul, Weiss lawyer named Greg Ezring who <a href=\"https:\/\/www.fec.gov\/data\/receipts\/individual-contributions\/?committee_id=C00576173&#038;contributor_name=Greg+Ezring\">gave $500<\/a> to Marshall\u2019s 2020 campaign. Emails <a href=\"https:\/\/www.justice.gov\/epstein\/files\/DataSet%209\/EFTA00990275.pdf\">indicate<\/a> that in 2014, Ezring was working on a donor-advised fund that Epstein was trying to stand up with the Gates Foundation, a deal that ultimately <a href=\"https:\/\/www.gatesfoundation.org\/ideas\/media-center\/press-releases\/2026\/07\/external-review\">fell through<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Ezring was also copied on a 2013 <a href=\"https:\/\/www.justice.gov\/epstein\/files\/DataSet%209\/EFTA00628113.pdf\">email<\/a>, which was forwarded to Epstein, about a matter involving private equity firm Apollo Global Management. The co-founder of Apollo, Leon Black, stepped down from the company in 2021 amid <a href=\"https:\/\/www.npr.org\/2026\/09\/16\/nx-s1-5954258\/leon-black-jeffrey-epstein-contempt-congress\">scrutiny<\/a> for his ties to Epstein.<\/p>\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Nothing in the emails suggests wrongdoing or indicates that Ezring and Epstein had a relationship beyond those matters. Ezring did not respond to an email requesting comment.<\/p>\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">And again, none of the four has been accused of any wrongdoing connected to Epstein.<\/p>\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">French, the WinSenate spokesperson, did not answer a question about the ad\u2019s characterization of these individuals as Epstein \u201cassociates.\u201d<\/p>\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading has-text-align-center\">Church Camp Allegations<\/h2>\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The <a href=\"https:\/\/www.factcheck.org\/2026\/08\/senate-leadership-fund-5\/\">Senate Leadership Fund<\/a>, a Republican super PAC affiliated with Senate Majority Leader John Thune, has spent more than $1.6 million on <a href=\"https:\/\/platform.adimpact.com\/viewer\/4b67b9bc-2a18-42f0-8eca-ddd9ddaf56f0\">an ad<\/a> alleging Hamilton covered up for a man who was accused of sexually abusing teens at a church camp two decades ago.\u00a0<\/p>\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The accusation was first made last spring by one of Hamilton\u2019s primary opponents. After reviewing the relevant court records, the Kansas City Star <a href=\"https:\/\/www.kansascity.com\/news\/politics-government\/article315922185.html\">wrote that<\/a> they did \u201cnot back up the core of [the opponent\u2019s] claims.\u201d<\/p>\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The Senate Leadership Fund ad opens on two boys in a darkened room with bunkbeds. <\/p>\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u201cThey say there\u2019s a special place in hell for pedophiles. But what about the enablers?\u201d the narrator says, as an image of Hamilton appears. \u201cWhat about pastor Adam Hamilton? Boys molested at Hamilton\u2019s church camp. Victims reported the predator. Hamilton\u2019s church swept it under the rug, then welcomed the pervert back to do it again. God will judge Adam Hamilton\u2019s heart. You can judge his leadership. Adam Hamilton protected a pedophile. He\u2019s unfit for U.S. Senate.\u201d<\/p>\n<div style='position:relative;width:100%;padding-top:56.25%;padding-bottom:40px;'><iframe loading='lazy' style='position:absolute;top:0;right:0;left:0;bottom:0;width:100%;height:100%;' src='https:\/\/platform.adimpact.com\/viewer\/4b67b9bc-2a18-42f0-8eca-ddd9ddaf56f0' frameborder='0' scrolling='no' allowfullscreen=''><\/iframe><\/div>\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Here\u2019s a quick synopsis of what happened, according to the Star\u2019s reporting.\u00a0(We were unable to view the records ourselves because they were not available online.)<\/p>\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">In 2005, teenage boys at a youth camp run by Church of the Resurrection, the church Hamilton co-founded, reported that a man had entered their rooms at night and molested them.\u00a0<\/p>\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Camp leaders were initially \u201cdismissive of their claims\u201d but did an internal investigation, according to a court decision quoted by the Star. That investigation was \u201cunable to conclusively identify the perpetrator,\u201d according to the document, though there were rumors it was a camp volunteer named Scott Preston Moore, according to records <a href=\"https:\/\/kansasreflector.com\/2026\/05\/27\/u-s-senate-candidate-in-kansas-faults-democratic-rivals-handling-of-reported-sex-abuse\/\">cited<\/a> by another local news outlet, the Kansas Reflector.<\/p>\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u201cNeither boy was able to make out the facial features of the suspect or positively identify the defendant due to the darkness of the room and the blinding light that had been shined directly at their faces,\u201d according to another court filing quoted by the Star.\u00a0<\/p>\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The church did not report the incidents to police. Hamilton\u2019s name does not appear in documents related to the handling of the incident, the Star reported.<\/p>\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The following year, Moore was accused of sneaking into boys\u2019 rooms at night, and this time identified as the culprit. Church leaders reported it to law enforcement and barred Moore from working with children or youth. Local prosecutors ultimately declined to file charges, according to the Star.<\/p>\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">In 2010, the Star reported, a man living out of state told Hamilton that Moore had abused him decades earlier, when Moore was his babysitter. According to the Star, the man decided to report the abuse to law enforcement after speaking with Hamilton.\u00a0<\/p>\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Shortly thereafter, police investigated a report that Moore had inappropriately touched a 16-year-old during a sleepover, according to the Star. Moore was <a href=\"https:\/\/www.kmbc.com\/article\/op-man-sentenced-in-sexual-battery-case\/3698815\">convicted<\/a> of that charge in 2013 and sentenced to a year in jail.<\/p>\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The Reflector <a href=\"https:\/\/kansasreflector.com\/2026\/05\/27\/u-s-senate-candidate-in-kansas-faults-democratic-rivals-handling-of-reported-sex-abuse\/\">reported<\/a> that the incidents from 2005 and 2006 were considerations in the case that led to his conviction.\u00a0<\/p>\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Hamilton has acknowledged the church could have handled the situation better, but has <a href=\"https:\/\/x.com\/AdImpact_Pol\/status\/2107461256831443005?s=10\">called<\/a> the allegations that he protected or covered up for a predator false.\u00a0<\/p>\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\u201cFirst of all, others investigated. I was actually preaching that weekend at Church of the Resurrection,\u201d he <a href=\"https:\/\/x.com\/KSNNews\/status\/2113097755581124717\">said<\/a> in an October debate. \u201cAnd I did not sign off on him going back. I should have checked to make sure that he wasn\u2019t going back. That was a mistake on my part. But I will tell you, when he was investigated the next year, we forbade him from working with youth or children any more. He left our church angry and upset. And again, we played a critical role several years later in getting him arrested and convicted.\u201d<\/p>\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Asked by CNN last month whether he would have done anything differently now, Hamilton <a href=\"https:\/\/www.cnn.com\/2026\/10\/18\/politics\/video\/cnn-manu-raju-kansas-senate-race-democrats-republicans-adam-hamilton-senator-roger-marshall\">responded<\/a>, \u201cAbsolutely. We should have called the police immediately. But that was not our policies 21 years ago.\u201d\u00a0<\/p>\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Asked for evidence to support the ad\u2019s claims, a Senate Leadership Fund spokesperson pointed us to a Senate Leadership Fund <a href=\"https:\/\/senateleadershipfund.org\/press-releases\/icymi-adam-hamilton-admits-failure-to-report-pedophile-to-police\/\">press release<\/a> highlighting the CNN quote.<\/p>\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity\"\/>\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><em>Editor\u2019s note:\u00a0FactCheck.org does not accept advertising. We rely on grants and individual donations from people like you. Please consider a donation. Credit card donations may be made through\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/giving.aws.cloud.upenn.edu\/?fastStart=simpleForm&#038;program=ANS&#038;fund=602014\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">our \u201cDonate\u201d page<\/a>. If you prefer to give by check, send to: FactCheck.org, Annenberg Public Policy Center, P.O. Box 58100, Philadelphia, PA 19102.\u00a0<\/em><\/p>\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">\n<p>The post <a href=\"https:\/\/www.factcheck.org\/2026\/11\/in-kansas-both-sides-twist-the-facts-in-accusations-of-protecting-pedophiles\/\">In Kansas, Both Sides Twist the Facts in Accusations of Protecting Pedophiles<\/a> appeared first on <a href=\"https:\/\/www.factcheck.org\">FactCheck.org<\/a>.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>In Kansas\u2019 tight Senate race, ads from Democratic and Republican outside groups are accusing the other party\u2019s candidate of having protected pedophiles. In both cases, the attacks are misleading or unsupported by the evidence. Ads from Democratic groups misleadingly claim Sen. Roger Marshall, the Republican incumbent, helped cover up Jeffrey Epstein\u2019s crimes by voting to [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":6,"featured_media":73279,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"tdm_status":"","tdm_grid_status":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-73278","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-factcheck"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/diaspora.biz\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/73278","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/diaspora.biz\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/diaspora.biz\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/diaspora.biz\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/6"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/diaspora.biz\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=73278"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/diaspora.biz\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/73278\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/diaspora.biz\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/73279"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/diaspora.biz\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=73278"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/diaspora.biz\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=73278"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/diaspora.biz\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=73278"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}